!!> PDF / Epub ✅ Marx (The Great Philosophers Series) ❤ Author Terry Eagleton – Morefreeinfo.info

Marx (The Great Philosophers Series) Supposed to be an introduction Or so I thought considering that it is barely like 60 or 80 pages long But Eagleton jumps right off the deep end talking about Marx as though he were talking to someone who already knew what all th Amazing Book, Marx The Great Philosophers Series Author Terry Eagleton This Is Very Good And Becomes The Main Topic To Read, The Readers Are Very Takjup And Always Take Inspiration From The Contents Of The Book Marx The Great Philosophers Series , Essay By Terry Eagleton Is Now On Our Website And You Can Download It By Register What Are You Waiting For Please Read And Make A Refission For You An extremely brief summary of Marx s philosophy According to Eagleton, Marx largely succeeded in pointing the way towards a future where each individual will be able to realize the full expression of their humanity Marx, nevertheless, was neither a fantasist nor a moralist his historical materialism grew from and recognized the centrality of the contingent material conditions from which it emerged while also giving appropriate credit to the p More a pamphlet than a booknot at all the Introduction to Marx that I was expecting A very short book a day s reading However, while Eagleton obviously knows his stuff, and presents a very knowledgeable and sympathetic portrait of Marx s ideas, it is not especially accessible or systematic The book reads like the observations of the author on selected p A real good introduction to Marxism Even a person with very little background of history and philosophy, will find this book very useful in understanding Marxism. Though a very short book, I have been reading this over a period of months b c it is small enough to carry in my pocket when I go to an appointment where I might have to wait awhile.Why read a book on Marx now This was written 20 years ago, but several years after the fall of Communism So this does make the obvious point that the communism that fell was not what Marx had in mind It remains an open question whether what Marx did have in mind is still possible Of course he was no visionary he was not committed to any details about what the ultimate ideal society would look like, so much as that it would be the outcome of a certain process He certainly got the timing wrong the last 100 years went nothing like he imagined But that the capitalistic forces that he invoked are still at work in the direction he imagined, with much the consequences that he imagined, can t really be doubted We just don t know whether there is some collapse in the cards that capitalism can t avoid, or what might come afterwards if it did collapse So there is work to do separating what in Marx was mistaken and what remains interesting Nevertheless, the label of Marxism is not one that will gain much traction in the modern world Look what trouble Bernie had even with socialism So I do not see much future in invoking Marx, and I think academics who do so My rating of this work was not based on my opinion on Marx or his thought That would simply be wrong thing to do After all, Marx didn t wrote this book, and even though it contains many of his quotes, it is in fact intellectual work of T Eagleton, and it should ONLY be rated in that context This book, as a work of Eagleton on the theme of Marx s thought, has some presuposed goals In reviewing and rating it, one should simply put in his sume did the book live up to this expectations, did it accomplish it s primary goal And what would that goals be Well, to briefly analyse core of the Marx s philosophy and explain it to the reader who is not so well familiar with this themes The book is clearly intended as an introduction to laymen, not as in depth analysis for experts.And the book simply didn t suceed in that primary goals One would thought that dense book of small volume would explain some of the Marx s problematics to the laymen appropriately, but that is not the case, and this book is in it s many aspects confusing, mainly for it s brief form But, not only, because of that I have some problems even with the terminology used in it as a translation of Marx s terms Many of terms used in this book are highly confusing, not straight fo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *